They were educated only enough to perform basic labor in white-run industries, They could not socialize with whites, have a voice in government, or even travel outside their designated areas without government approval. All blacks--who made up 70 percent of the population--had to carry "pass books" that recorded their movements, and could be arrested for inviting whites to their homes without approval.
"We speak out to put the world on guard against what is happening in South Africa. The brutal policy of apartheid is applied before the eyes of the nations of the world. The peoples of Africa are compelled to endure the fact that on the African continent the superiority of one race over another remains official policy, and that in the name of this racial superiority murder is committed with impunity. Can the United Nations do nothing to stop this?" — Che Guevara, speech to the United Nations as Cuba's representative, December 11, 1964.
Then 30 years after a inter/nationwide revolutionary movement, the Apartheid was bannished. However, from the looks of this report, it seems like, the Apartheid never died -why? In 1994, they only abolished the physical and institutionnal aspect of the segregation, whereas South- africans were conditionned by a mental Apartheid, in the first place. The fundamental core of the Apartheid were completely neglected, that's why racial segregation is still predominating; but at the only difference that now, it's anti-white.
Modern Apartheid is a contradiction for some but, a reverse evolution for others.
UN GROS "RIEN "!
Voilà ce que j'en pense! Cela peut-être très inquiétant de ne ressentir une once d'indignation à l'égard de ce personnage, de banaliser (certains diront) les propos racistes. Je pense que c'est trop simpliste de faire des gros-plans sur les dérives de la société quand on en esquive délibérement les sources. Ce vieillard est le fruit d'un système désuét, encore rythmé aux heures coloniales.D'où Don't hate the player, hate the Game. Ils sont plein dans les rues françaises et partout ailleurs, cessons d'être hypocrites. Ils sont plein à avoir refoulé l'ère post-coloniale, les dites-indépendances.Pourquoi ? Prédominance oligarchique . Oui, mais encore ?
Well, I believe that those violences has been escalated, '' those higher on the hierarchy'' have purposely created this era of terror. The system elaborates disinformation, propaganda, conspiracy theories, strategies of tension (tactics which consists in committing itself criminal attacks and in attributing them to somebody else) and fomenting of terrorist attacks - all this for which motive? The establishment of the New Order World, predominated by the greatest ideology - the greatest civilization - the greatest religion- the greatest nations.
The demonization of Islam could be a masquerade consisting in developing the fear of the public opinion , in alimenting wars - unofficial oil wars or religious wars. The terrorism would be then a war of diversion, a substitute war.As matter of fact, the terrorism isn't an islamic label as many want us to believe, these exactions are bilateral, and he who, will lead a nationalist vendetta, will vindicate and legitimize the upcoming crimes.
Fear and Ignorance are the enemy.
Hossein Derakhshan was sentenced after being convicted of several offences, including spreading propaganda against the ruling establishment and insulting Islamic thoughts and religious figures. The 35-year-old was also convicted of promoting counter-revolutionary groups and working with "enemy states," because he visited Israel five years ago.
Foreign aid consists largely of one government’s “helping” another government by beefing up its budget, increasing its power over the private sector, and multiplying its leverage over its citizens. As economist P.T. Bauer observed, there is an “inherent bias of government-to-government aid towards state control and politicization.” Foreign aid greatly increases the patronage power of recipient governments.
You don’t help a beggar by giving him money regularly, but by implementing all the necessary conditions, so that he will earn his own money.
Foreign aid kills Africa. Those institutions essentially provide and promise, money, food and goods already produced by western countries, which generates aid-dependency and doesn't help at all Africa's economy.
Plus, as Moyo pointed out, the system of aid and monetary donations painted a negative image of Africa, as poor, unstable and corrupt.
Actually, the main issue in these institutions is, there are no prospects of a long-term "rehabilitation". The foreign aid is a counterproductive "help system" which draggs down the Third World economic system. In fact, this short-term-help is nothing more than a long-term-trading, with developments of natural and mineral resources as a bargaining chip.
To affirm that the African nations do not need help, it would be a false over-estimation; Africa needs a good and lasting aid: (technologies, patents, licenses, knowledge, investments) everything which will create jobs and establish training, so that African nations will manage their own business.
First of all, an economic decentralization is essential, it would limit the government power in order to privilege individuals; and this, will put an end to dictatorships, overthrows, corruption. Then, the climate of stability will consequently permit the development of the middle class, free enterprise and the private sector's empowerment. And there will come prosperity and peace.
The solution proposed by Dr. Moyo is imperative for Africa, but somehow, I fear that her optimism has unfortunately overshadowed the dark African realities which remain the huge obstacle to capitalism and democracy (attitudes, primitive customs and traditional society, tribalism).
